Post by Purp1eOne on Apr 4, 2024 8:31:57 GMT -6
"EXPERT" MEANS DEMOCRAT
You will never see someone labeled an "expert" by a US establishment outlet if they do not support the Party line.
For example, Elon Musk is not an "expert" on rockets. Palmer Luckey is not an "expert" on defense. And Mark Zuckerberg, founder of a trillion dollar company, is somehow not an "expert" on business.
Why? The state is blue, the media is blue, and academia is blue. So, blue media quotes blue academics who support blue policies.
"Expert" just means Democrat.
More specifically, an expert is a Democrat who justifies what Democrats want to do. For example, misinformation means not-Democrat information. Hate speech means not-Democrat speech. Science means Democrat-published science. Journalism means Democrat-affiliated journalism. And so on.
This one filter gets you 99% of the way. And it gives the game away.
Remember, a Democrat would never vote for a Republican. That would be against "democracy". They thus define democracy as control by Democrats, as one-party control. So they don't actually want "democracy" in the sense of competitive multiparty elections, but in the sense of Californian uniparty coronations.
Once you label things blue — once you apply the tribal lense, once you can see the blues — the capture of words like "expert", "journalism", "misinformation", "science", and "democracy" itself by Democrats can be identified and rejected.
CITATIONS
1) Academia is blue. The original data comes from Figure 1 of Langbert's 2018 survey of 5116 faculty members. He presented the data as a ratio, but in the original tweet I calculated the underlying percentages.
nas.org/academic-questions/31/2/homogenous_the_political_affiliations_of_elite_liberal_arts_college_faculty
2) The state is blue: bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-election-trump-biden-donors/
3) Media is blue: bit.ly/3PKM792
4) California is blue: ballotpedia.org/Party_control_of_California_state_government