Deleted Member
Deleted
Jan 1, 1970
Valhalla
|
Epstein
Nov 7, 2019 6:28:27 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 6:28:27 GMT -6
From 2017 this is attorney for whistleblower WTF. And some people still believe this BS. Laughin....... Fact check recently? Didn't think so. Twitter the home of misinformation conspiracy theories live on.
|
|
Deleted Member
Deleted
Jan 1, 1970
Valhalla
|
Epstein
Nov 7, 2019 6:47:35 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 6:47:35 GMT -6
|
|
Deleted Member
Deleted
Jan 1, 1970
Valhalla
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 8:06:35 GMT -6
vikingpitbull, I'm not a Twitter guy. I have an account so if there's a tweet link I can open and read it, as well as the comments. Which often to me are more entertaining then the tweet itself. Ps: I have Facebook as well. Use that even less. I haven't posted in a couple years. Only maybe 6 total. My dozens of...well dozen friends already know I'm boring because I'm related to them. Social media is an epidemic addiction they has spread it's pandemic mind eating virus world wide...imo of coarse.
|
|
|
Post by angryguy77 on Nov 7, 2019 9:05:01 GMT -6
Most battleground states are not polling in favor of this. All this is going to do is help him beat the dems like a drum after this.
If they continue this, I'm betting the House gets swept back to the GOP and Trump will have a majority in both houses and not have to worry about reelection.
I don't like your system being abused and corrupted in an effort to undo an election, but they are going to pay a heavy price for this that might take them at min 2 elections to recover from.
The dems need to pay a much higher price than just losing elections. They need to do jail time and some need their very lives taken from them. This nothing short of a coup attempt. There are provisions in the Constitution for these sort of acts. I agree, but it won't happen. If Hillary can walk around free, the system has already been corrupted. This is one reason why I believe the decline is inevitable, the only thing we can do is push it off.
|
|
|
Post by angryguy77 on Nov 7, 2019 9:06:39 GMT -6
If they continue this, I'm betting the House gets swept back to the GOP and Trump will have a majority in both houses and not have to worry about reelection. But will they do anything? They may have a better chance with Ryan out of the way but there are still too many already bought and paid for to get a lot accomplished. Still a lot of swamp floating around. I'm not holding my breath, but I think we'll get a little more than before. Plus the office of the president can do a lot(not that I believe this should be the case, but it's the reality we live in.)
|
|
|
Post by angryguy77 on Nov 7, 2019 9:08:25 GMT -6
Most battleground states are not polling in favor of this. All this is going to do is help him beat the dems like a drum after this.
If they continue this, I'm betting the House gets swept back to the GOP and Trump will have a majority in both houses and not have to worry about reelection.
I don't like your system being abused and corrupted in an effort to undo an election, but they are going to pay a heavy price for this that might take them at min 2 elections to recover from.
Just so you understand the exact same procedure was followed by the process for Nixon and Clinton. Pay attention to something other than Faux News. I owe you a big thanks pitt. Go back to the 1st page and see what I wrote.
You keep living in your fantasy world where you think everyone hates Trump. Just remember, you were warned of what was coming.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Nov 7, 2019 9:38:04 GMT -6
Most battleground states are not polling in favor of this. All this is going to do is help him beat the dems like a drum after this.
If they continue this, I'm betting the House gets swept back to the GOP and Trump will have a majority in both houses and not have to worry about reelection.
I don't like your system being abused and corrupted in an effort to undo an election, but they are going to pay a heavy price for this that might take them at min 2 elections to recover from.
Just so you understand the exact same procedure was followed by the process for Nixon and Clinton. Pay attention to something other than Faux News. LMAO! Dude, please open your eyes. The procedures are not nearly the same. Let's start with the most obvious one. In the two impeachments you mentioned, the votes to impeach were bi-partisan. In this one, the only votes crossing the isle were AGAINST impeachment.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Nov 7, 2019 9:47:38 GMT -6
You can't help yourself can you? Do you ever get your news without a filter and make up your own mind? Or do you just like being told what to think? The Biden thing means nothing to you? Not surprised Mr. Democrat over country... I do make up my own mind and I dont need a party to tell me how to think unlike you. As an American you should try to be objective and actually look at what is happening. Not what your party and one channel tell you to think. You're just hell bent to admit any worng doing and spin it at all cost. Trump is getting his ass handed to him in so many directions if you where open minded and objective you could see it. You have no idea what is truly happening. I do because there are laws being broken and Republicans working for Trump that wont take the fall for him anymore. It sucks when truth is there and you don't want to see it. You forget. I'm not a Republican. And almost never watch Fox News. Rut Roh, broke your narrative. By the way Fox News has been proven over and over to be more accurate than your echo chamber with the stories I referenced earlier in this thread. Open your eyes.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Nov 7, 2019 9:58:42 GMT -6
You are right Jimmy, my viewpoint is a selfish one, but I am old beyond my years I guess. Wont have grandkids to worry about, so you are right about my viewpoint. I still vote, a conservative who only wants change for the better. Not sure what I can do to change but i should pay more attention. I cant do much, but need to do my bit so will stay tuned in more. Don't think it will help much, as the liberal bent in this country is toward dismembering our country whether they know it or not, but I owe it to the country to try. I really enjoy your thinking and your posts. Isn't all politics kinda selfish? That's the nature of it. People vote and may say. I'm doing it for the future of our country. Really it is the future you envision. So selfish... I have been labeled the lib and been on the liberal side of most social issues. Wasn't it the conservatives that wanted less government involvement in people's lives? That's me, stay out where you don't belong. Now where in all my 5000+ posts have I ever said. Gosh darn it we just don't spend enough money in this country? I'm not just about spending less but just not spending way more then you intend to make. Then just printing more money when you run out. You name me one President in my adult life that has lived up to my vision? I have been on the wrong side of the board on environmental issues. I can't hardly mention I wish we'd try and live cleaner without being carpet bombed Imma climate change boogeyman. Which I do believe but not getting back in that one. Believe what you want. I have 2 grandsons that will be sharing this planet with like 10 billion other folks crapping all over it long after I'm gone. I simply wish we'd figure out ways to crap less for them. That me in a nuthous...nutshell. I like this post. But is there a little hyperbole here? Are you really carpet bombed when you say you wish we'd try to live cleaner? I know I've never opposed that. I don't recall anyone on this board defending the idea we should live dirtier. I think it's pretty unanimous that everyone is open to making things better. It the how that rubs people wrong. The use of an emotional issue to force things that are not guaranteed to even help. That kind of stuff. I've mentioned before but I have some experience with modeling. I have never modeled the environment but I have modeled hydrologic and hydraulic systems. I can tell you first hand there is a lot of ART that goes into this science. And the environmental models are even more so. We should be very careful making decisions based on these models. And the models need to be calibrated and updated. I have not seen that at all. For years we've seen predictions come and go. But more of the same alarmist predictions keep being made with no questions. Several years ago I was having this discussion with some on another board. I started getting comments like "good luck breathing in 10 years". After seeing that comment multiple times I took note and put it in my calendar because I take note when I see crazy stuff masquerading as science. In 10 years I will get a reminder. That was approximately 5 years ago. Hopefully this board is still around then so I can "remind" people.
|
|
Movikx
.
Thegn (2,829)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by Movikx on Nov 7, 2019 10:02:55 GMT -6
SMH.... No, the leftist MSM isn’t in cahoots with one another... They’ll protect their own at all costs.
|
|
Deleted Member
Deleted
Jan 1, 1970
Valhalla
|
Epstein
Nov 7, 2019 10:04:13 GMT -6
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 10:04:13 GMT -6
I really enjoy your thinking and your posts. Isn't all politics kinda selfish? That's the nature of it. People vote and may say. I'm doing it for the future of our country. Really it is the future you envision. So selfish... I have been labeled the lib and been on the liberal side of most social issues. Wasn't it the conservatives that wanted less government involvement in people's lives? That's me, stay out where you don't belong. Now where in all my 5000+ posts have I ever said. Gosh darn it we just don't spend enough money in this country? I'm not just about spending less but just not spending way more then you intend to make. Then just printing more money when you run out. You name me one President in my adult life that has lived up to my vision? I have been on the wrong side of the board on environmental issues. I can't hardly mention I wish we'd try and live cleaner without being carpet bombed Imma climate change boogeyman. Which I do believe but not getting back in that one. Believe what you want. I have 2 grandsons that will be sharing this planet with like 10 billion other folks crapping all over it long after I'm gone. I simply wish we'd figure out ways to crap less for them. That me in a nuthous...nutshell. I like this post. But is there a little hyperbole here? Are you really carpet bombed when you say you wish we'd try to live cleaner? I know I've never opposed that. I don't recall anyone on this board defending the idea we should live dirtier. I think it's pretty unanimous that everyone is open to making things better. It the how that rubs people wrong. The use of an emotional issue to force things that are not guaranteed to even help. That kind of stuff. I've mentioned before but I have some experience with modeling. I have never modeled the environment but I have modeled hydrologic and hydraulic systems. I can tell you first hand there is a lot of ART that goes into this science. And the environmental models are even more so. We should be very careful making decisions based on these models. And the models need to be calibrated and updated. I have not seen that at all. For years we've seen predictions come and go. But more of the same alarmist predictions keep being made with no questions. Several years ago I was having this discussion with some on another board. I started getting comments like "good luck breathing in 10 years". After seeing that comment multiple times I took note and put it in my calendar because I take note when I see crazy stuff masquerading as science. In 10 years I will get a reminder. That was approximately 5 years ago. Hopefully this board is still around then so I can "remind" people. Nice, Thanks smoked that's all I ask. Live cleaner. Anything said to me I've already put in the past. Move forward always.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Nov 7, 2019 10:09:29 GMT -6
SMH.... No, the leftist MSM media isn’t in cahoots with one another... They’ll protect their own at all costs. How many kids had to suffer because ABC buried a story that would hurt team blue?
|
|
Movikx
.
Thegn (2,829)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by Movikx on Nov 7, 2019 10:11:22 GMT -6
SMH.... No, the leftist MSM media isn’t in cahoots with one another... They’ll protect their own at all costs. How many kids had to suffer because ABC buried a story that would hurt team blue? Exactly!
|
|
vikingdan
Drengr (1,322)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by vikingdan on Nov 7, 2019 11:08:29 GMT -6
SMH.... No, the leftist MSM media isn’t in cahoots with one another... They’ll protect their own at all costs. How many kids had to suffer because ABC buried a story that would hurt team blue? ABC is team blue, they just put on their journalism uniforms as cover. Kinda like a referee doing a game in GB pretending to be neutral except it's not sports and it has real world consequences.
|
|
Deleted Member
Deleted
Jan 1, 1970
Valhalla
|
Epstein
Nov 7, 2019 11:56:56 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2019 11:56:56 GMT -6
Just so you understand the exact same procedure was followed by the process for Nixon and Clinton. Pay attention to something other than Faux News. LMAO! Dude, please open your eyes. The procedures are not nearly the same. Let's start with the most obvious one. In the two impeachments you mentioned, the votes to impeach were bi-partisan. In this one, the only votes crossing the isle were AGAINST impeachment. Wrong again.
|
|