Now that fake Russia has been exposed as a farce its time to investigate the investigators. Both fake Russia and Crooked Hillary/other people crimes. We had a failed coup and its a big deal being played down by MSM who was in on the coup.
Even though the State of Illinois and City of Chicago is just one area of the US, the Jussie Smollett case is an example of the two-tiered justice system that exists and will continue to exist until there are examples made of those elite facing the same consequences as the rest of us....
"I'm gonna tell you somethin' right now. While you're out there playing patty cake with your friend Pedro, your Uncle Rico is makin' 120 bucks."
I need to run and get my tinfoil hat but I don't want to miss anything!
Last Jan of '18, you said: "Trump colluded.
Mueller will prosecute.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled broadcast."
That post hasn't aged well. 😉
Now stand aside and let some other American taxpayers have their investigation. Since it turns out they were proved correct about Trump/Russia collusion (wasn't any).
I'd like to see two issues investigated with the same vigor as Mueller's witch hunt. 1. The FISA court decisions that allowed the FBI to spy on Trump's campaign via Carter Page. 2. The FBI's decision to exonerate HR's email felonies.
Those two issues would entail most of the individuals that have not been brought to justice, so far.
Let an old Democrat lead the investigation, IDC. But, staff 15 conservative prosecutors (Trey Gowdy types) on the team. Let them feloniously leak grand jury testimony to a willing press, like Mueller's team did, along the way.
Post by savannahskol on Apr 9, 2019 11:47:25 GMT -6
None of the Americans listed had/have been charged with collusion/obstruction with the election. NONE. All charged with process crimes.
So Mueller caught a Russian troll farm? Big whoop, they been doing it for ages. Good luck on extradicting them to stand trial.
Btw, prosecutors do not "exonerate". They indict, or they don't.... based on grand jury testimony. And grand jury witnesses do not have defense counsel present to rebut/crossexamine, etc. That is why prosecutors never make exoneration statements... as there was no real "trial". That was an unprofessional line added to the report.
Been a rough couple weeks for ya'll, I understand. 😎 But buck-up. You can still put some slim hope in the SDNY, lol.