Odin's Cooler Alumnus
kramerhammer
Viking (5,537)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by kramerhammer on Mar 13, 2018 14:44:25 GMT -6
Mueller is a giant piece of shit imo. So was Starr IMO.
|
|
|
Post by badgervike on Mar 13, 2018 14:52:46 GMT -6
Mueller is a giant piece of shit imo. So was Starr IMO. Yep...Special Prosecutors should have a very narrow focus...and only that focus. If there are other areas for investigation...name another Special Prosecutor. That's why they're hesitant to name a Special Prosecutor...you get the Starr investigation of everything besides what he was named for and the Mueller investigation of everything...except collusion with the Russians.
|
|
Uncle
Berserker (7,565)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by Uncle on Mar 13, 2018 14:56:48 GMT -6
Clinton appointed a Special Prosecutor for the Whitewater Corporation dealings review in 1994: Ken Star was appointed the lead in Aug 1994. Starr drafted an impeachment referral to the House of Representatives in the fall of 1997, alleging that there was "substantial and credible evidence" that Bill Clinton had committed perjury regarding David Hale's allegations of illegal loans to Susan McDougal. In September 1998, Independent Counsel Starr released the Starr Report, concerning offenses alleged to have been committed by President Clinton, as part of the Lewinsky scandal.
So the original Whitewater Counsel sort-of concluded after nearly 3 years, and then an extra year was added for the Lewinsky probe, so 4 years - from 1994 to 1998.
If that Counsel is any precedent, then Mueller could drag the Trump/Russia collusion investigation until well after the 2020 election.
|
|
Movikx
.
Thegn (2,829)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by Movikx on Mar 14, 2018 16:49:40 GMT -6
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 17:31:29 GMT -6
I'll be fair, perhaps it is. The other side of that is why Mueller is still fishing for anything after this long? If the evidence were there of Trump's collusion why wouldn't he have moved on it? Our Democratic friends seem to believe the evidence is strong that Trump colluded, so why the delay? That seems more Kangaroo at this point to me. Special councils have 18 months. How long did the special councils on Clinton run? Longer? Shorter? I don't know. The longer this runs the more worried I would be as a Trump supporter. Bump from a year ago, didn’t turn out like leftists thoight.
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 17:33:03 GMT -6
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 17:33:40 GMT -6
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 17:41:20 GMT -6
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 17:50:37 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 22, 2019 18:15:38 GMT -6
Those of us who follow honest news knew this two years ago.
Someone around here once said, "mark my words, Trump will be found guilty of collusion AND obstruction". I wonder if that person will now own up?
Is anybody on the left questioning their "news" sources today?
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 18:20:56 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 22, 2019 18:24:37 GMT -6
Lol, was just going to post that.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 22, 2019 18:26:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Bezerker88 on Mar 22, 2019 18:48:09 GMT -6
Watching CNN right now is like watching your child open socks on Christmas morning...
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 22, 2019 18:54:50 GMT -6
Watching CNN right now is like watching your child open socks on Christmas morning... I still remember MSNBC Madcow crying when Trump won election lol Might get round 2?
|
|