|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 25, 2019 8:52:42 GMT -6
|
|
OkieDokie
Surviving
Jarl (22,857)
Feb 5, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by OkieDokie on Mar 25, 2019 9:15:06 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by badgervike on Mar 25, 2019 9:37:38 GMT -6
NewsWhip, a social-media analytics company, whipped up this astonishing data for Axios' Neal Rothschild:
Since May 2017, 533,074 web articles have been published about Russia and Trump/Mueller. Those generated 245 million interactions (likes, comments and shares) on Twitter and Facebook.
Be smart: Now, think of how much cable time the coverage consumed.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 25, 2019 9:42:40 GMT -6
Sheesh...
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 25, 2019 9:48:13 GMT -6
Trump should trademark "collusion delusion".
|
|
|
Post by PurplePastor on Mar 25, 2019 9:49:11 GMT -6
What loses in all this? Credibility! No one is automatically considered credible anymore. So what do people do? They blindly follow hype. Since the latest hype changes weekly, those who can hype it up with seeming relevance, will be followed. The scary part is that hype doesn't have anything to do with reality and facts. This will absolutely destroy our nation unless people reject hype for substance and demand that substance be followed through.
|
|
|
Post by tempevike on Mar 25, 2019 10:20:45 GMT -6
Remember when the media reported that 17 intelligence agencies had 100% consensus that Russia hacked the election?
|
|
|
Post by tempevike on Mar 25, 2019 10:24:37 GMT -6
The only reason I knew there was no collusion was because YouTube stop recommending all those Russian conspiracy videos. It was so nice when they alone knew the truth about Russian collusion and put an end to all this fake news months ago and banned dangerous people like Rachel Maddow.
|
|
|
Post by badgervike on Mar 25, 2019 10:27:16 GMT -6
|
|
vikingdan
Drengr (1,322)
Feb 8, 2017
Valhalla
|
Post by vikingdan on Mar 25, 2019 10:51:30 GMT -6
I just read this article and it is time to investigate all of the people who had reason to create this massive lie starting where it always starts, the Clintons.
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 25, 2019 11:18:43 GMT -6
I just read this article and it is time to investigate all of the people who had reason to create this massive lie starting where it always starts, the Clintons. John Brennan and Adam Schiff ABSOLUETLY deserve to be in prison.
|
|
|
Post by Purplemachine on Mar 25, 2019 11:30:25 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by badgervike on Mar 25, 2019 11:36:30 GMT -6
I just read this article and it is time to investigate all of the people who had reason to create this massive lie starting where it always starts, the Clintons. John Brennan and Adam Schiff ABSOLUETLY deserve to be in prison. Does anybody know whether a Congressman can be subpoenaed to the Senate? If I were Lindsey Graham, I'd subpoena Schiff to testify (under oath) regarding his "sources" of Intelligence that proves collusion with the Russians as he claims. He must have some secret back channel Intelligence that nobody else has been made aware of....or...he's just a liar. Mueller and the House have already found no evidence of collusion despite 2 years of investigations and hundreds of people interviewed. Schiff was still maintaining his proof of collusion crap over the weekend....well...prove it...under oath.
The other thing that bothers me is the fixation with the Trump Tower meeting with Don jr that is still going on in the Liberal media. Trump jr took the meeting ostensibly because there was supposedly dirt on Clinton (aka Opposition Research). Junior left the meeting when it became apparent it was just to discuss the Magnitsky Act...so no dirt. So...Junior was clearly "colluding" with the Russians according to the media and possibly committed Treason. On the other side, you have the Steele Dossier paid for by the Hillary Clinton and used to start this whole thing....and they don't see a problem with it. Steele, a retired British Intelligence Officer, gathered "research" primarily from Russian Intelligence sources..some factual, some already known, and some salacious. So...is this type of thing ok...as long as you go through a British agent? Or..is it ok because you paid for the whole thing..and then used it to justify this whole 2 year witch hunt? Or...is it ok because you're Hillary Clinton?
If I were a Republican member of the House Intelligence Committee...I would also demand in an open hearing to view the "Intelligence" that Schiff has on Russian collusion and has evidently been keeping to himself......knowing full well he's full of it.
|
|
|
Post by tempevike on Mar 25, 2019 11:36:48 GMT -6
If there is a better example of slander, I cannot really think of it:
"You have a president, who in my opinion beyond a shadow of a doubt, sought to, however ham-handedly, collude with the Russian government, a foreign power to undermine and influence our elections." Beto O'Rourke, March 23, 2019
"[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." Special Counsel Robert Mueller & Attorney General Bill Barr, March 24, 2019
|
|
|
Post by SmokedPears on Mar 25, 2019 12:02:47 GMT -6
John Brennan and Adam Schiff ABSOLUETLY deserve to be in prison. Does anybody know whether a Congressman can be subpoenaed to the Senate? If I were Lindsey Graham, I'd subpoena Schiff to testify (under oath) regarding his "sources" of Intelligence that proves collusion with the Russian's as he claims. He must have some secret back channel Intelligence that nobody else has been made aware of....or...he's just a liar. Mueller and the House have already found no evidence of collusion despite 2 years of investigations and hundreds of people interviewed. Schiff was still maintaining his proof of collusion crap over the weekend....well...prove it...under oath.
The other thing that bothers me is the fixation with the Trump Tower meeting with Don jr that is still going on in the Liberal media. Trump jr took the meeting ostensibly because there was supposedly dirt on Clinton (aka Opposition Research). Junior left the meeting when it became apparent it was just to discuss the Magnitsky Act...so no dirt. So...Junior was clearly "colluding" with the Russians according to the media and possibly committed Treason. On the other side, you have the Steele Dossier paid for by the Hillary Clinton and used to start this whole thing....and they don't see a problem with it. Steele, a retired British Intelligence Officer, gathered "research" primarily from Russian Intelligence sources..some factual, some already known, and some salacious. So...is this type of thing ok...as long as you go through a British agent? Or..is it ok because you paid for the whole thing..and then used it to justify this whole 2 year witch hunt? Or...is it ok because you're Hillary Clinton?
Brennan and Schiff both used their position and credentials to push a narrative with no evidence. It's really sick. Worse than yelling "FIRE" in a theater imo.
|
|